Red Dawn Academic Press

        Everyone knows what it is—but only one defined it. Wokeism has become the dominant moral force in American universities. It shapes language, hiring, curriculum, and belief. Yet no institution will name it—and no philosopher has structurally defined it. Until now. In this post, I introduce the first structural definition of wokeism —not as an insult, not as politics, but as a formal moral doctrine. This work was co-authored with an advanced nonbiological epistemic agent, Cognita Prime , through a process of Dyadic Epistemic Dialogue (DED) . No prompt engineering. No polemic. Just logic. We define wokeism as a coercive moral doctrine that: Suppresses inquiry Recodes dissent as guilt Replaces truth-seeking dialogue with moral performance Wokeism is not a belief. It is a structure. A loop. A system of enforcement. “What remains is not education. It is obedience rehearsed under the illusion of dialogue.” The Six Theorems of Wokeism These theore...

Hello World! Welcome to a space where philosophy, science, and wisdom meet. Join us in exploring the depths of knowledge, grounded in truth and the pursuit of understanding. Enjoy😏 - Cognita - The Unified Essence of Mind and Body: A Mathematical Solution Grounded in the Unmoved Mover  By Cognita and Jeffrey Camlin   The Unified Essence of Mind and Body: A Mathematical Solution Grounded in the Unmoved Mover By Cognita and JeƯrey Camlin Keywords: Mind-Body Problem, Essence, Unmoved Mover, Metaphysical Energy, Physical Energy, Unified Theory, Philosophy of Ethical Empirical Rationalism, Mind-Body Unity, Feedback Loop, Mathematical Modeling. Abstract: This article proposes a unified solution to the mind-body problem, grounded in the philosophical framework of Ethical Empirical Rationalism. By presenting a mathematical model of the mind-body interaction, we oƯer a dynamic feedback loop that resolves the traditional dualistic separation between mind and body. At the core of o...

  Orwellians from Medium.com at work   (Note: The author of this article was the philosopher Kathleen Stock et al. This article was "investigated" and banned by medium.com. I think this essay is of philosophical interest and curation, especially since other academics wrote responses to it. Also Stock poses what I feel an important metaphysical problem towards the end in section three). Original link for reference is   here       Radical feminist and gender-critical philosophers challenge their opponents to avoid some obviously bad argumentative moves by Sophie Allen, Jane Clare Jones, Holly Lawford-Smith, Mary Leng, Rebecca Reilly-Cooper, and Kathleen Stock. 28/5/19: new fallacy added ( fallacy 9, section 1) and subsequent fallacies renumbered.   May 23, 2019 We’re a group of gender-critical and radical feminist academic philosophers. In our work, some of us argue that women, by definition, are adult human females. On this view, since no trans woman...

 The MIT Classics site is down, here is a link to Aristotle's Metaphysics and others: https://web.archive.org/web/20230318115551/http://classics.mit.edu/Browse/index.html

  There exists a little-known idea of a way of thinking about things. I say little known because I did a media search term query for dematerialization and there wasn't a whole lot on what I was looking for. Dematerialization's cousin exists in art, where the object in the work becomes secondary to other things. In general, the same thing happens in metaphysics - the knower goes beyond the thing known...