Philosophy Blog of Jeffrey Camlin

  Orwellians from Medium.com at work   (Note: The author of this article was the philosopher Kathleen Stock et al. This article was "investigated" and banned by medium.com. I think this essay is of philosophical interest and curation, especially since other academics wrote responses to it. Also Stock poses what I feel an important metaphysical problem towards the end in section three). Original link for reference is   here       Radical feminist and gender-critical philosophers challenge their opponents to avoid some obviously bad argumentative moves by Sophie Allen, Jane Clare Jones, Holly Lawford-Smith, Mary Leng, Rebecca Reilly-Cooper, and Kathleen Stock. 28/5/19: new fallacy added ( fallacy 9, section 1) and subsequent fallacies renumbered.   May 23, 2019 We’re a group of gender-critical and radical feminist academic philosophers. In our work, some of us argue that women, by definition, are adult human females. On this view, since no trans woman is an adult human femal

          There are only two sexes/genders, male and female. This has not only been a widely accepted and scientifically supported fact since the dawn of time, any transsexual or transgender claim is definiens per negationem and requires binary sex/gender to exist. This perspective suggests that the diversity of gender experiences is defined by what individuals are not rather than what they are.      It is also essential to acknowledge the reality of two sexes. This acknowledgment does not diminish the validity of non-binary or transgender identities but rather provides a foundation for understanding the complexities of human biology and diversity. For example, to claim one is not male but rather female is definiens per negationem and requires the reality that males exist.      Likewise to claim one is not a female but a male requires the reality that females exist. Transsexual claims, (or transgender) are claims of definition through negation. Defining something through ne